5.3
CVSS V3
Build, ship, and run secure software with minimal, hardened container images — rebuilt from source daily and guarded under our industry-leading remediation SLA.
Start for freeNetty: Start-Line Injection in DefaultHttpRequest.setUri() Allows HTTP Request Smuggling and RTSP Request Injection
Netty allows request-line validation to be bypassed when a DefaultHttpRequest or DefaultFullHttpRequest is created first and its URI is later changed via setUri().
The constructors reject CRLF and whitespace characters that would break the start-line, but setUri() does not apply the same validation. HttpRequestEncoder and RtspEncoder then write the URI into the request line verbatim. If attacker-controlled input reaches setUri(), this enables CRLF injection and insertion of additional HTTP or RTSP requests.
In practice, this leads to HTTP request smuggling / desynchronization on the HTTP side and request injection on the RTSP side.
The root issue is that URI validation exists only on the constructor path, but not on the public setter path.
io.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpRequest
HttpUtil.validateRequestLineTokens(method, uri)setUri(String uri) only performs checkNotNull and does not validateio.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultFullHttpRequest
setUri(String uri) delegates to the parent implementationio.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoder
request.uri() directly into the request lineio.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspEncoder
request.uri() directly into the request lineThis creates the following bypass:
DefaultHttpRequest or DefaultFullHttpRequest with a safe URIsetUri()HttpRequestEncoder or RtspEncoder encodes that value verbatimThis appears to be an incomplete fix pattern where start-line validation exists, but can still be bypassed through a mutable public API.
The following code first creates a normal request object and then injects a malicious request line using setUri().
When reproduced, the raw encoded request looks like this:
HttpServerCodec then parses this as multiple HTTP messages rather than a single request:
GET /s1POST /s2 with body Hello WorldGET /s1This confirms that the value supplied through setUri() is interpreted on the wire as additional requests.
The same root cause also affects RtspEncoder. A minimal reproduction is shown below.
When reproduced, RtspEncoder generates consecutive RTSP requests in a single encoded payload:
RtspDecoder then parses this as three separate RTSP requests:
OPTIONS rtsp://cam/streamDESCRIBE rtsp://cam/secretOPTIONS rtsp://cam/finalThis confirms that the same setter bypass is exploitable for RTSP request injection as well.
The vulnerable conditions are:
DefaultHttpRequest or DefaultFullHttpRequestsetUri()setUri() is attacker-controlled or attacker-influencedHttpRequestEncoder or RtspEncoderUnder those conditions, an attacker may be able to:
The exact impact depends on how the application constructs URIs and how the upstream/downstream HTTP or RTSP components parse request boundaries, but the security impact is real and reproducible.
Validation is enforced only at object construction time, but not on the public mutation API that can break the same security invariant.
As a result, the constructors are safe while the public setUri() path is not, and the encoders trust and serialize the mutated value without revalidation.
DefaultHttpRequest.setUri() and all delegating/inheriting paths should apply the same request-line token validation as the constructors.
Recommended regression coverage:
setUri() rejects CRLF-containing input after object constructionDefaultFullHttpRequest.setUri() is blocked as well\r, \n, and request-smuggling payloads are rejectedHttpRequestEncoder and RtspEncoder are protected from setter-based bypassesnetty-codec-httpio.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultHttpRequestio.netty.handler.codec.http.DefaultFullHttpRequestio.netty.handler.codec.http.HttpRequestEncoderio.netty.handler.codec.rtsp.RtspEncoder