DirectorySecurity AdvisoriesPricing
Sign in
Security Advisories

GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4

https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4

Severity

4.4

Medium

CVSS V3

Eliminate CVEs with Chainguard hardened images

Build, ship, and run secure software with minimal, hardened container images — rebuilt from source daily and guarded under our industry-leading remediation SLA.

Start for free

Summary

webpki: CRLs not considered authoritative by Distribution Point due to faulty matching logic

Description

If a certificate had more than one distributionPoint, then only the first distributionPoint would be considered against each CRL's IssuingDistributionPoint distributionPoint, and then the certificate's subsequent distributionPoints would be ignored.

The impact was that correct provided CRLs would not be consulted to check revocation. With UnknownStatusPolicy::Deny (the default) this would lead to incorrect but safe Error::UnknownRevocationStatus. With UnknownStatusPolicy::Allow this would lead to inappropriate acceptance of revoked certificates.

This vulnerability is thought to be of limited impact. This is because both the certificate and CRL are signed -- an attacker would need to compromise a trusted issuing authority to trigger this bug. An attacker with such capabilities could likely bypass revocation checking through other more impactful means (such as publishing a valid, empty CRL.)

More likely, this bug would be latent in normal use, and an attacker could leverage faulty revocation checking to continue using a revoked credential.

References

  • https://github.com/advisories/GHSA-pwjx-qhcg-rvj4

Affected packages


The trusted source for open source

Talk to an expert
PrivacyTerms

Product

Chainguard ContainersChainguard LibrariesChainguard VMsChainguard OS PackagesChainguard ActionsChainguard Agent SkillsIntegrationsPricing
© 2026 Chainguard, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Chainguard® and the Chainguard logo are registered trademarks of Chainguard, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
The other respective trademarks mentioned on this page are owned by the respective companies and use of them does not imply any affiliation or endorsement.