DirectorySecurity AdvisoriesPricing
Sign in
Security Advisories

CVE-2025-39682

NVD

https://nvd.nist.gov/vuln/detail/CVE-2025-39682

Severity

9.8

Critical

CVSS V3

Eliminate CVEs with Chainguard hardened images

Build, ship, and run secure software with minimal, hardened container images — rebuilt from source daily and guarded under our industry-leading remediation SLA.

Start for free

Summary

tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list

Description

In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved:

tls: fix handling of zero-length records on the rx_list

Each recvmsg() call must process either

  • only contiguous DATA records (any number of them)
  • one non-DATA record

If the next record has different type than what has already been processed we break out of the main processing loop. If the record has already been decrypted (which may be the case for TLS 1.3 where we don't know type until decryption) we queue the pending record to the rx_list. Next recvmsg() will pick it up from there.

Queuing the skb to rx_list after zero-copy decrypt is not possible, since in that case we decrypted directly to the user space buffer, and we don't have an skb to queue (darg.skb points to the ciphertext skb for access to metadata like length).

Only data records are allowed zero-copy, and we break the processing loop after each non-data record. So we should never zero-copy and then find out that the record type has changed. The corner case we missed is when the initial record comes from rx_list, and it's zero length.

Affected packages


The trusted source for open source

Talk to an expert
PrivacyTerms

Product

Chainguard ContainersChainguard LibrariesChainguard VMsChainguard OS PackagesChainguard ActionsChainguard Agent SkillsIntegrationsPricing
© 2026 Chainguard, Inc. All Rights Reserved.
Chainguard® and the Chainguard logo are registered trademarks of Chainguard, Inc. in the United States and/or other countries.
The other respective trademarks mentioned on this page are owned by the respective companies and use of them does not imply any affiliation or endorsement.